<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Blå skärm-Crashing system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blaskarm.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts about a collapsing civilization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:06:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Basic instincts by Rachail</title>
		<link>http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/basic-instincts/#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/basic-instincts/#comment-958</guid>
		<description>I like what you talked about. It made alot of sence. And i also agree that the rainforest must be savedm and not used for housing or wood for paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like what you talked about. It made alot of sence. And i also agree that the rainforest must be savedm and not used for housing or wood for paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not crashed yet :) by Steve Salmony</title>
		<link>http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/2008/07/07/not-crashed-yet/#comment-950</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Salmony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/?p=63#comment-950</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your clear voice.

More voices.......we need many more voices speaking out loudly and often.  Time is being wasted by those with wealth and power who adamantly defend unsustainable status quo overconsumption, overproduction and overpopulation activities of the human species that are overwhelming and threatening to ravage the Earth in our time.  Because these distinctly human activities could soon become patently unsustainable, necessary behavior change has to occur fast.  If more members of the human family do not speak out to vigorously resist what the leaders of the human community are demanding all of us do now as we strive to ravenously overconsume Earth&#039;s resources; to relentlessly hoard wealth; and to overproduce unnecessary stuff, then the planetary home we are inhabiting and overpopulating could be made uninhabitable for our children and life as we know it by 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your clear voice.</p>
<p>More voices&#8230;&#8230;.we need many more voices speaking out loudly and often.  Time is being wasted by those with wealth and power who adamantly defend unsustainable status quo overconsumption, overproduction and overpopulation activities of the human species that are overwhelming and threatening to ravage the Earth in our time.  Because these distinctly human activities could soon become patently unsustainable, necessary behavior change has to occur fast.  If more members of the human family do not speak out to vigorously resist what the leaders of the human community are demanding all of us do now as we strive to ravenously overconsume Earth&#8217;s resources; to relentlessly hoard wealth; and to overproduce unnecessary stuff, then the planetary home we are inhabiting and overpopulating could be made uninhabitable for our children and life as we know it by 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let&#8217;s face the truth about climate change mitigation (I) by Random T.</title>
		<link>http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/lets-face-the-truth-about-climate-change-mitigation-i/#comment-946</link>
		<dc:creator>Random T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/lets-face-the-truth-about-climate-change-mitigation-i/#comment-946</guid>
		<description>After reading through this article, I   feel that I really need more info. Could you share some   resources please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading through this article, I   feel that I really need more info. Could you share some   resources please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let&#8217;s face the truth about climate change mitigation (I) by iusbvision</title>
		<link>http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/lets-face-the-truth-about-climate-change-mitigation-i/#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator>iusbvision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/lets-face-the-truth-about-climate-change-mitigation-i/#comment-934</guid>
		<description>You have the CO2 correlation the wrong way around. The temperature moves and then the CO2 levels FOLLOW with about an 800 year gap. That is because the oceans act like a slow acting sponge for CO2. The ice core samples demonstrate this fact clearly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have the CO2 correlation the wrong way around. The temperature moves and then the CO2 levels FOLLOW with about an 800 year gap. That is because the oceans act like a slow acting sponge for CO2. The ice core samples demonstrate this fact clearly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on mithrandir by norman holy</title>
		<link>http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/about/mithrandir/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>norman holy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/about/mithrandir/#comment-922</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m inquiring about the graph of 450,000 vs CO2.  I would like to ask for permission to publish the graph in a book I&#039;m writing about the North Atlantic Ocean.  Do you own the graph?  Is it copywrited?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m inquiring about the graph of 450,000 vs CO2.  I would like to ask for permission to publish the graph in a book I&#8217;m writing about the North Atlantic Ocean.  Do you own the graph?  Is it copywrited?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let&#8217;s face the truth about climate change mitigation (I) by Alexwebmaster</title>
		<link>http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/lets-face-the-truth-about-climate-change-mitigation-i/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexwebmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/lets-face-the-truth-about-climate-change-mitigation-i/#comment-921</guid>
		<description>Hello webmaster 
I would like to share with you a link to your site 
write me here preonrelt@mail.ru</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello webmaster<br />
I would like to share with you a link to your site<br />
write me here <a href="mailto:preonrelt@mail.ru">preonrelt@mail.ru</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Biofuels &#8211; Let&#8217;s face the truth about climate change mitigation (II) by Kipp Alpert</title>
		<link>http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/biofuels-lets-face-the-truth-about-climate-change-mitigation-ii/#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator>Kipp Alpert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/biofuels-lets-face-the-truth-about-climate-change-mitigation-ii/#comment-912</guid>
		<description>Steve Salmony:Nice piece:You talk about the family of man.Well,isn&#039;t that the problem.Most people can&#039;t see humanity as one entity in a universe of ubiquitous parts. Man&#039;s own ego and pride gets in the way of his higher self and his real relationships with people. Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote a great paper on Commodity. He saw a commidity as something that nature gave man, and something man should use in a generous way ;to be commodius. Well the fences have gone up, the public beaches have become private, and it&#039;s every man for himself. Until a person understands the meaning of generosity, and loves another as himself, we are lost.
You can&#039;t grow corn and feed man at the same time. I am willing to give up my car, for public transportation, if that would feed one person,one day, with one bowl of rice. The question is,are we all on the same page? KIPP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Salmony:Nice piece:You talk about the family of man.Well,isn&#8217;t that the problem.Most people can&#8217;t see humanity as one entity in a universe of ubiquitous parts. Man&#8217;s own ego and pride gets in the way of his higher self and his real relationships with people. Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote a great paper on Commodity. He saw a commidity as something that nature gave man, and something man should use in a generous way ;to be commodius. Well the fences have gone up, the public beaches have become private, and it&#8217;s every man for himself. Until a person understands the meaning of generosity, and loves another as himself, we are lost.<br />
You can&#8217;t grow corn and feed man at the same time. I am willing to give up my car, for public transportation, if that would feed one person,one day, with one bowl of rice. The question is,are we all on the same page? KIPP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About this blog by ian</title>
		<link>http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/about-this-blog/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/about-this-blog/#comment-905</guid>
		<description>Alaska rules, suck my dick sweden</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alaska rules, suck my dick sweden</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Biofuels &#8211; Let&#8217;s face the truth about climate change mitigation (II) by Grained</title>
		<link>http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/biofuels-lets-face-the-truth-about-climate-change-mitigation-ii/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>Grained</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/biofuels-lets-face-the-truth-about-climate-change-mitigation-ii/#comment-885</guid>
		<description>Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation :) Anyway ... nice blog to visit.

cheers, Grained!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Anyway &#8230; nice blog to visit.</p>
<p>cheers, Grained!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Biofuels &#8211; Let&#8217;s face the truth about climate change mitigation (II) by Steve Salmony</title>
		<link>http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/biofuels-lets-face-the-truth-about-climate-change-mitigation-ii/#comment-881</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Salmony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blaskarm.wordpress.com/2007/11/25/biofuels-lets-face-the-truth-about-climate-change-mitigation-ii/#comment-881</guid>
		<description>Dear Dr. L. B.,

I am imagining that your questions are rhetorical ones.

You ask, 

“Why are politicians and skeptics so willing to risk their future and everyone else’s future on blindly clinging to a course of action that has a high probability of leading to a seriously crippled future? If you even suspect that global warming represents a serious risk to your survival (and we have far more than suspicion these days), why wouldn’t you do everything protect and conserve your planet?”

It would please me to hear from others; but from my humble perspective the “answers” to your questions are all-too-obvious.

First, the leaders in my generation of elders wish to live without having to accept limits to growth of seemingly endless economic globalization, of increasing per capita consumption and skyrocketing human population numbers; our desires are evidently insatiable. We choose to believe anything that is politically convenient, economically expedient and socially agreeable; our way of life is not negotiable. We dare anyone to question our values or behaviors.

We religiously promote our shared fantasies of endless economic growth and soon to be unsustainable overconsumption, overproduction oand overpopulation activities, and in so doing deny that Earth has limited resources upon which the survival of life as we know it depends. 

Second, my not-so-great generation appears to be doing a disservice to everything and everyone but ourselves. We are the “what’s in it for me?” generation. We demonstrate precious little regard for the maintenance of the integrity of Earth; shallow willingness to actually protect the environment from crippling degradation; lack of serious consideration for the preservation of biodiversity, wilderness, and a good enough future for our children and coming generations; and no appreciation of the understanding that we are no more or less than human beings with “feet of clay.” 

We live in a soon to be unsustainable way in our planetary home and are proud of it, thank you very much. Certainly, we will “have our cake and eat it, too.” We will fly around in thousands of private jets and live in McMansions, go to our secret clubs and distant hideouts, and risk nothing of value to us. Please do not bother us with the problems of the world. We choose not to hear, see or speak of them. We are the economic powerbrokers, their bought-and-paid-for politicians and the many minions in the mass media. We hold the much of the wealth and the power it purchases. If left to our own devices, we will continue in the exercise of our ‘rights’ to ravenously consume Earth’s limited resources; to expand economic globalization unto every corner of our natural world and, guess what, beyond; to encourage the unbridled growth of the human species so that where there are now 6+ billion people, by 2050 we will have 9+ billion members of the human community and, guess what, even more people, perhaps billions more in the distant future, if that is what we desire. 

We are the reigning, self-proclaimed masters of the universe. We have no regard for human limits or Earth’s limitations, thank you very much. Please understand that we do not want anyone to present us with scientific evidence that we could be living unsustainably in an artificially designed, temporary world of our own making…… a manmade world filling up with distinctly human enterprises which appear the be approaching a point in human history when global consumption, production and propagation activities of the human species become unsustainable on the tiny planet God has blessed us to inhabit….. and not to overwhelm, I suppose. 

Third, even our top rank scientists have not found adequate ways of communicating to the family of humanity what people somehow need to hear, see and understand: the reckless dissipation of Earth’s limited resources, the relentless degradation of the planet’s frangible environment, and the approaching destruction of the Earth as a fit place for human habitation by the human species, when taken together, appear to be proceeding at a breakneck pace toward the precipitation of a catastrophic ecological wreckage of some sort unless, of course, the world’s colossal, ever expanding, artificially designed, manmade global economy continues to speed headlong toward the monolithic ‘wall’ called “unsustainability” at which point the runaway economy crashes before Earth’s ecology is collapsed.

Sincerely,

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Dr. L. B.,</p>
<p>I am imagining that your questions are rhetorical ones.</p>
<p>You ask, </p>
<p>“Why are politicians and skeptics so willing to risk their future and everyone else’s future on blindly clinging to a course of action that has a high probability of leading to a seriously crippled future? If you even suspect that global warming represents a serious risk to your survival (and we have far more than suspicion these days), why wouldn’t you do everything protect and conserve your planet?”</p>
<p>It would please me to hear from others; but from my humble perspective the “answers” to your questions are all-too-obvious.</p>
<p>First, the leaders in my generation of elders wish to live without having to accept limits to growth of seemingly endless economic globalization, of increasing per capita consumption and skyrocketing human population numbers; our desires are evidently insatiable. We choose to believe anything that is politically convenient, economically expedient and socially agreeable; our way of life is not negotiable. We dare anyone to question our values or behaviors.</p>
<p>We religiously promote our shared fantasies of endless economic growth and soon to be unsustainable overconsumption, overproduction oand overpopulation activities, and in so doing deny that Earth has limited resources upon which the survival of life as we know it depends. </p>
<p>Second, my not-so-great generation appears to be doing a disservice to everything and everyone but ourselves. We are the “what’s in it for me?” generation. We demonstrate precious little regard for the maintenance of the integrity of Earth; shallow willingness to actually protect the environment from crippling degradation; lack of serious consideration for the preservation of biodiversity, wilderness, and a good enough future for our children and coming generations; and no appreciation of the understanding that we are no more or less than human beings with “feet of clay.” </p>
<p>We live in a soon to be unsustainable way in our planetary home and are proud of it, thank you very much. Certainly, we will “have our cake and eat it, too.” We will fly around in thousands of private jets and live in McMansions, go to our secret clubs and distant hideouts, and risk nothing of value to us. Please do not bother us with the problems of the world. We choose not to hear, see or speak of them. We are the economic powerbrokers, their bought-and-paid-for politicians and the many minions in the mass media. We hold the much of the wealth and the power it purchases. If left to our own devices, we will continue in the exercise of our ‘rights’ to ravenously consume Earth’s limited resources; to expand economic globalization unto every corner of our natural world and, guess what, beyond; to encourage the unbridled growth of the human species so that where there are now 6+ billion people, by 2050 we will have 9+ billion members of the human community and, guess what, even more people, perhaps billions more in the distant future, if that is what we desire. </p>
<p>We are the reigning, self-proclaimed masters of the universe. We have no regard for human limits or Earth’s limitations, thank you very much. Please understand that we do not want anyone to present us with scientific evidence that we could be living unsustainably in an artificially designed, temporary world of our own making…… a manmade world filling up with distinctly human enterprises which appear the be approaching a point in human history when global consumption, production and propagation activities of the human species become unsustainable on the tiny planet God has blessed us to inhabit….. and not to overwhelm, I suppose. </p>
<p>Third, even our top rank scientists have not found adequate ways of communicating to the family of humanity what people somehow need to hear, see and understand: the reckless dissipation of Earth’s limited resources, the relentless degradation of the planet’s frangible environment, and the approaching destruction of the Earth as a fit place for human habitation by the human species, when taken together, appear to be proceeding at a breakneck pace toward the precipitation of a catastrophic ecological wreckage of some sort unless, of course, the world’s colossal, ever expanding, artificially designed, manmade global economy continues to speed headlong toward the monolithic ‘wall’ called “unsustainability” at which point the runaway economy crashes before Earth’s ecology is collapsed.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
